skip to main |
skip to sidebar
When Bernie Sanders was asked during CNN’s Democratic presidential debate how a self-proclaimed socialist could hope to be elected to the White House, he gave the answer he usually gives
notes
Jeff Jacoby in the Boston Globe:
Socialism has been wonderful for the countries of Scandinavia, and America should emulate their example.“We
should look to countries like Denmark, like Sweden and Norway, and
learn from what they have accomplished for their working people,”
Sanders said.
Liberals have had a crush on Scandinavia for decades. “It is a country
whose very name has become a synonym for a materialist paradise,” observed Time magazine
in a 1976 story on Sweden. “Its citizens enjoy one of the world’s
highest living standards. . . . Neither ill health, unemployment nor old
age pose the terror of financial hardship. [Sweden’s] cradle-to-grave
benefits are unmatched in any other free society outside Scandinavia.”
In 2010, a National Public Radio story marveled at the way “Denmark Thrives Despite High Taxes.”
The small Nordic nation, said NPR, “seems to violate the laws of the
economic universe,” improbably balancing low poverty and unemployment
rates with stratospheric taxes that were among the world’s highest.
Such paeans may inspire Clinton’s love and Sanders’ faith in
America’s socialist future. As with most urban legends, however, the
reality of Scandinavia’s welfare-state utopia doesn’t match the hype.
… It was in the late 1960s and early 1970s that taxes soared, welfare payments expanded, and entrepreneurship was discouraged.
But what emerged wasn’t heaven on earth.
That 1976 story in
Time, for example, went on to report that Sweden found itself struggling
with crime, drug addiction, welfare dependency, and a plague of red
tape. Successful Swedes — most famously, Ingmar Bergman
— were fleeing the country to avoid its killing taxes. “Growing numbers
are plagued by a persistent, gnawing question: Is their Utopia going
sour?”
Sweden’s world-beating growth rate dried up. In 1975, it had
been the fourth-wealthiest nation on earth (as measured by GDP per
capita); by 1993, it had dropped to 14th. By then, Swedes had begun to
regard their experiment with socialism as, in Sanandaji’s phrase, “a colossal failure.”
Denmark has come to a similar conclusion. Its lavish subsidies are being rolled back amid sharp concerns about welfare abuse and an eroding work ethic. In the last general election, Danes replaced a left-leaning government with one tilted to the right. Loving Denmark doesn’t mean loving big-government welfarism.
The
real key to Scandinavia’s unique successes isn’t socialism, it’s
culture. Social trust and cohesion, a broad egalitarian ethic, a strong
emphasis on work and responsibility, commitment to the rule of law —
these are healthy attributes of a Nordic culture that was ingrained over
centuries. In the region’s small and homogeneous countries
(overwhelmingly white, Protestant, and native-born), those norms took
deep root. The good outcomes and high living standards they produced
antedated the socialist nostrums of the 1970s. Scandinavia’s quality of
life didn’t spring from leftist policies. It survived them.
… No, Scandinavia doesn’t “violate the laws of the economic
universe.” It confirms them. With free markets and healthy values,
almost any society will thrive. Socialism only makes things worse.