On the same day that Venezuela’s “democratically” elected socialist
president, Nicolas Maduro, whose once-wealthy nation now has citizens
foraging for food, announced he was lopping five zeros off the country’s
currency to create a “stable financial and monetary system,” Meghan
McCain of “The View” was the target of internet-wide condemnation for
having stated some obvious truths about collectivism.
Thus writes
David Harsanyi in the Daily Signal in a piece entitled
Sorry If You’re Offended, but Socialism Leads to Misery and Destitution.
During the same week we learned that the democratic socialist
president of Nicaragua, Daniel Ortega, is accused of massacring hundreds
of protesters whose economic futures have been decimated by his
economic policies, Soledad O’Brien and writers at outlets ranging from
GQ, to BuzzFeed, to the Daily Beast were telling McCain to cool her
jets.
In truth, McCain was being far too calm. After all, socialism is the
leading man-made cause of death and misery in human existence. Whether
implemented by a mob or a single strongman, collectivism is a poverty
generator, an attack on human dignity, and a destroyer of individual
rights.
It’s true that not all socialism ends in the tyranny of Leninism or
Stalinism or Maoism or Castroism or Ba’athism or Chavezism or the Khmer
Rouge—only most of it does. And no, New York primary winner Alexandria
Ocasio-Cortez doesn’t intend to set up gulags in Alaska. Most so-called
democratic socialists—the qualifier affixed to denote that they live in a
democratic system and have no choice but to ask for votes—aren’t
consciously or explicitly endorsing violence or tyranny.
But when they adopt the term “socialism” and the ideas associated
with it, they deserve to be treated with the kind of contempt and
derision that all those adopting authoritarian philosophies deserve.
But look: Norway!
Socialism is perhaps the only ideology that Americans are asked to
judge solely based on its piddling “successes.” Don’t you dare mention
Albania or Algeria or Angola or Burma or Congo or Cuba or Ethiopia or
Laos or Somalia or Vietnam or Yemen or, well, any other of the dozens of
other inconvenient places socialism has been tried. Not when there are a
handful of Scandinavian countries operating generous welfare state
programs propped up by underlying vibrant capitalism and natural
resources.
Of course, socialism exists on a spectrum, and even if we accept that
the Nordic social program experiments are the most benign iteration of
collectivism, they are certainly not the only version. Pretending
otherwise would be like saying, “The police state of Singapore is more
successful than Denmark. Let’s give it a spin.”
It turns out, though, that the “Denmark is awesome!” talking point is
only the second-most preposterous one used by socialists. It goes
something like this: If you’re a fan of “roads, schools, libraries, and
such,” although you may not even be aware of it, you are also a
supporter of socialism.
This might come as a surprise to some, but every penny of the $21,206
spent in Ocasio-Cortez’s district each year on each student, rich or
poor, is provided with the profits derived from capitalism.
There is no
welfare system, no library that subsists on your good intentions. Having
the state take over the entire health care system could rightly be
called a socialistic endeavor, but pooling local tax dollars to put
books in a building is called local government.
It should also be noted that today’s socialists get their yucks by
pretending collectivist policies only lead to innocuous outcomes like
local libraries. But for many years they were also praising the
dictators of Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela. Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt.,
the nation’s most successful socialist, isn’t merely impressed with the
goings-on in Denmark. Not very long ago, he lauded Hugo Chavez’s
Venezuela as an embodiment of the “American dream,” even more so than
the United States.
Socialists like to blame every inequity, the actions of every greedy
criminal, every downturn, and every social ill on the injustice of
capitalism. But none of them admit that capitalism has been the most
effective way to eliminate poverty in history.
Today, in former socialist states like India, there have been big
reductions in poverty thanks to increased capitalism. In China, where
communism sadly still deprives more than a billion people of their basic
rights, hundreds of millions benefit from a system that is slowly
shedding socialism. Since the fall of the Soviet Union, the extreme
poverty rate in the world has been cut in half. And it didn’t happen
because Southeast Asians were raising the minimum wage.
In the United States, only 5 percent of people are even aware that
poverty has fallen in the world, according to the Gapminder Foundation,
which is almost certainly in part due to the left’s obsession with
“inequality” and normalization of “socialism.”
Nearly half of American millennials would rather live in a socialist
society than in a capitalist one, according to a YouGov poll. That said,
only 71 percent of those asked were able to properly identify either.
We can now see the manifestation of this ignorance in our elections and
“The View” co-host Joy Behar.
But if all you really champion are some higher taxes and more
generous social welfare, stop associating yourself with a philosophy
that usually brings destitution and death. Call it something else. If
not, McCain has every right to associate you with the ideology you
embrace.
